vs
4.6Display8.6
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Fit Touch 3 better than Fit 1.0?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.78″+3%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Fit Touch 3?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Touch 3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Thickness | — | 12 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
