vs
4.6Display6.3
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Fit Touch 3 better than JR-FV2?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.43″+28%
Why is JR-FV2 better than Fit Touch 3?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Fit Touch 3: Yes
- Battery capacity230 mAh vs 300 mAh+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 48 mm |
| Weight | 48 g | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 230 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
