NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 2 (Round) vs GTS 4 Mini

Amazfit Active 2 (Round) vs Amazfit GTS 4 Mini

What Active 2 (Round) does better (4) and where GTS 4 Mini wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 2 (Round)
Amazfit · 2024Active 2 (Round)
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $100
vs
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
AmazfitGTS 4 Mini
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
7.3Display6.0
6.3Battery life8.4
8.7Build & durability8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 2 (Round)GTS 4 Mini
43.9 × 43.99.941.8 × 36.79.1
Active 2 (Round)GTS 4 MiniDifference
Height43.9 mm36.7 mm+7.2 mm
Width43.9 mm41.8 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness9.9 mm9.1 mm+0.8 mm
Weight30 g31 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 2 (Round) better than GTS 4 Mini?

  1. Weight29.5 g vs 31.2 g+6%
  2. Resolution (width)466 px vs 336 px+39%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 126+27%
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 309 ppi+14%

Why is GTS 4 Mini better than Active 2 (Round)?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 15 days+50%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.65″+25%
  3. Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.1 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare