NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 2 (Round) vs Poco Watch

Amazfit Active 2 (Round) vs Xiaomi Poco Watch

What Active 2 (Round) does better (5) and where Poco Watch wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 2 (Round)
Amazfit · 2024Active 2 (Round)
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco Watch
Xiaomi · 2022Poco Watch
7.1Score
2 advantages≈ $95
7.3Display6.1
8.7Build & durability8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 2 (Round)Poco Watch
43.9 × 43.99.934.4 × 39.110
Active 2 (Round)Poco WatchDifference
Height43.9 mm39.1 mm+4.8 mm
Width43.9 mm34.4 mm+9.5 mm
Thickness9.9 mm10 mm−0.1 mm
Weight30 g31 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 2 (Round) better than Poco Watch?

  1. SpeakerYes · Poco Watch: No
  2. Weight29.5 g vs 31 g+5%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 320 px+46%
  4. Battery capacity270 mAh vs 225 mAh+20%
  5. Pixel density353 ppi vs 301 ppi+17%

Why is Poco Watch better than Active 2 (Round)?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.6″+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare