NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 2 (Square) vs Cheetah 2 Ultra

Amazfit Active 2 (Square) vs Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra

What Active 2 (Square) does better (4) and where Cheetah 2 Ultra wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 2 (Square)
Amazfit · 2025Active 2 (Square)
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ $150
vs
Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
9.2Display8.8
6.3Battery life9.7
5.0Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor9.6
8.6Build & durability5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 2 (Square)Cheetah 2 Ultra
43.3 × 36.9947.4 × 47.413.3
Active 2 (Square)Cheetah 2 UltraDifference
Height36.9 mm47.4 mm−10.5 mm
Width43.3 mm47.4 mm−4.1 mm
Thickness9 mm13.3 mm−4.3 mm
Weight31 g52 g−21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 2 (Square) better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Weight31.4 g vs 52 g+66%
  2. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.5″+17%
  3. Thickness9 mm vs 13.3 mm+48%
  4. Pixel density341 ppi vs 323 ppi+6%

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Active 2 (Square)?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 30 days3×
  2. Battery capacity260 mAh vs 780 mAh3×
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 480 px+23%
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 180+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare