NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Active 3 Premium vs Bip Max

Amazfit Active 3 Premium vs Amazfit Bip Max

What Active 3 Premium does better (4) and where Bip Max wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Active 3 Premium
Amazfit · 2026Active 3 Premium
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ $170
vs
Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
9.0Display9.6
8.2Battery life9.2
9.8Health tracking5.0
9.7Sports & outdoor9.8
6.8Build & durability3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Active 3 PremiumBip Max
45 × 451149.5 × 49.510.9
Active 3 PremiumBip MaxDifference
Case size45 mm49.5 mm−4.5 mm
Thickness11 mm10.9 mm+0.1 mm
Weight38 g53 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Active 3 Premium better than Bip Max?

  1. Weight38 g vs 52.6 g+38%
  2. Sport profiles170 vs 150+13%
  3. Pixel density353 ppi vs 324 ppi+9%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 432 px+8%

Why is Bip Max better than Active 3 Premium?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)12 days vs 20 days+67%
  2. GPS battery life24 h vs 40 h+67%
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 2.07″+57%
  4. Battery capacity365 mAh vs 550 mAh+51%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare