NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip Max vs GTR Mini

Amazfit Bip Max vs Amazfit GTR Mini

What Bip Max does better (6) and where GTR Mini wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
6 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Amazfit GTR Mini
Amazfit · 2023GTR Mini
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $120
9.6Display5.5
9.2Battery life8.5
3.4Build & durability6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip MaxGTR Mini
49.5 × 49.510.942.8 × 42.89.2
Bip MaxGTR MiniDifference
Case size49.5 mm42.8 mm+6.7 mm
Thickness10.9 mm9.2 mm+1.7 mm
Weight53 g36 g+16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip Max better than GTR Mini?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 14 days+43%
  2. GPS battery life40 h vs 25 h+60%
  3. Screen size2.07″ vs 1.28″+62%
  4. Battery capacity550 mAh vs 280 mAh+96%
  5. Sport profiles150 vs 126+19%
  6. Resolution (width)432 px vs 416 px+4%

Why is GTR Mini better than Bip Max?

  1. Weight52.6 g vs 36.2 g+45%
  2. Thickness10.9 mm vs 9.2 mm+18%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare