NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Bip Max vs X5

Amazfit Bip Max vs Cubot X5

What Bip Max does better (5) and where X5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Bip Max
Amazfit · 2026Bip Max
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Cubot X5
Cubot · 2026X5
4.9Score
2 advantages
9.6Display8.8
5.0Health tracking5.0
5.3Smart features3.9
3.4Build & durability2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Bip MaxX5
49.5 × 49.510.945.4 × 53.914.4
Bip MaxX5Difference
Case size49.5 mm45.4 mm+4.1 mm
Thickness10.9 mm14.4 mm−3.5 mm
Weight53 g84 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Bip Max better than X5?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  2. Weight52.6 g vs 84 g+60%
  3. Thickness10.9 mm vs 14.4 mm+32%
  4. Pixel density324 ppi vs 304 ppi+7%
  5. Resolution (width)432 px vs 410 px+5%

Why is X5 better than Bip Max?

  1. Screen size2.07″ vs 2.13″+3%
  2. Battery capacity550 mAh vs 900 mAh+64%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare