NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Pro vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar

What Cheetah 2 Pro does better (8) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Pro
7.6Score
8 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
5 advantages≈ $400
8.7Display4.0
5.6Battery life8.8
9.6Sports & outdoor6.2
5.2Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 ProInstinct 3 50mm Solar
48 × 4813.250 × 5014.4
Cheetah 2 ProInstinct 3 50mm SolarDifference
Height48 mm50 mm−2 mm
Width48 mm50 mm−2 mm
Thickness13.2 mm14.4 mm−1.2 mm
Weight46 g58 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Pro better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  2. Resolution (width)466 px vs 176 px2.6×
  3. Pixel density353 ppi vs 113 ppi3.1×
  4. Storage32 GB vs 0.12 GB266.7×
  5. Weight45.6 g vs 58 g+27%
  6. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  7. Sport profiles170 vs 94+81%
  8. Thickness13.2 mm vs 14.4 mm+9%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than Cheetah 2 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 40 days2×
  2. GPS battery life26 h vs 60 h2.3×
  3. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  4. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.56″+18%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 34 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare