NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs T-Rex 3 Pro

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (5) and where T-Rex 3 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $600
vs
Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
8.8Display9.7
9.7Battery life9.0
4.9Health tracking9.6
9.6Sports & outdoor9.5
4.1Smart features4.1
5.0Build & durability8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraT-Rex 3 Pro
47.4 × 47.413.348 × 4814
Cheetah 2 UltraT-Rex 3 ProDifference
Height47.4 mm48 mm−0.6 mm
Width47.4 mm48 mm−0.6 mm
Thickness13.3 mm14 mm−0.7 mm
Weight52 g74 g−22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 25 days+20%
  2. Weight52 g vs 74.5 g+43%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 38 h+58%
  4. Battery capacity780 mAh vs 700 mAh+11%
  5. Thickness13.3 mm vs 14 mm+5%

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Pixel density323 ppi vs 466 ppi+44%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare