NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Approach S72 43mm

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Approach S72 43mm

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (4) and where Approach S72 43mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $800
8.8Display5.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
9.6Sports & outdoor6.7
4.1Smart features3.2
5.0Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraApproach S72 43mm
47.4 × 47.413.343 × 4312.9
Cheetah 2 UltraApproach S72 43mmDifference
Height47.4 mm43 mm+4.4 mm
Width47.4 mm43 mm+4.4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm12.9 mm+0.4 mm
Weight52 g41 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 10 days3×
  2. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.3″+15%
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 416 px+15%

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Weight52 g vs 41 g+27%
  2. Thickness13.3 mm vs 12.9 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare