NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Forerunner 965

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Forerunner 965

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (7) and where Forerunner 965 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 965
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 965
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ $600
8.8Display6.5
9.7Battery life6.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor6.0
4.1Smart features6.5
5.0Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraForerunner 965
47.4 × 47.413.347.2 × 47.213.2
Cheetah 2 UltraForerunner 965Difference
Height47.4 mm47.2 mm+0.2 mm
Width47.4 mm47.2 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness13.3 mm13.2 mm+0.1 mm
Weight52 g53 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Forerunner 965?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 23 days+30%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 19 h3.2×
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 802.2×
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 965: No
  5. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  6. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is Forerunner 965 better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

Forerunner 965 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare