NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Forerunner 970

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Forerunner 970

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (7) and where Forerunner 970 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $750
8.8Display6.5
9.7Battery life4.7
4.9Health tracking8.3
9.6Sports & outdoor6.6
4.1Smart features3.2
5.0Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraForerunner 970
47.4 × 47.413.347 × 4712.9
Cheetah 2 UltraForerunner 970Difference
Height47.4 mm47 mm+0.4 mm
Width47.4 mm47 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm12.9 mm+0.4 mm
Weight52 g56 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Forerunner 970?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 15 days2×
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 21 h2.9×
  3. Storage64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  4. Sport profiles180 vs 94+91%
  5. Weight52 g vs 56 g+8%
  6. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Thickness13.3 mm vs 12.9 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare