NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition

What Cheetah 2 Ultra does better (9) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $500
8.8Display4.0
9.7Battery life8.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.6Sports & outdoor6.5
5.0Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah 2 UltraInstinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition
47.4 × 47.413.350 × 5014.4
Cheetah 2 UltraInstinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical EditionDifference
Height47.4 mm50 mm−2.6 mm
Width47.4 mm50 mm−2.6 mm
Thickness13.3 mm14.4 mm−1.1 mm
Weight52 g58 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah 2 Ultra better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition: No
  2. Resolution (width)480 px vs 176 px2.7×
  3. Pixel density323 ppi vs 113 ppi2.9×
  4. Storage64 GB vs 0.12 GB533.3×
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition: No
  6. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  7. Weight52 g vs 58 g+12%
  8. GPS battery life (dual-band)60 h vs 34 h+76%
  9. Thickness13.3 mm vs 14.4 mm+8%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition better than Cheetah 2 Ultra?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 40 days+33%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.56″+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare