NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Pro vs T-Rex Ultra

Amazfit Cheetah Pro vs Amazfit T-Rex Ultra

What Cheetah Pro does better (4) and where T-Rex Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Pro
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Pro
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ $300
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
9.4Display8.0
6.0Battery life7.2
9.8Sports & outdoor6.0
4.5Build & durability6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah ProT-Rex Ultra
47 × 4711.847.3 × 47.313.4
Cheetah ProT-Rex UltraDifference
Height47 mm47.3 mm−0.3 mm
Width47 mm47.3 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness11.8 mm13.4 mm−1.6 mm
Weight34 g89 g−55 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Pro better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. Weight34 g vs 89 g2.6×
  2. Screen size1.45″ vs 1.39″+4%
  3. Thickness11.8 mm vs 13.4 mm+14%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Cheetah Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20 days+43%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life44 h vs 46 h+5%
  4. Battery capacity440 mAh vs 500 mAh+14%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 28 h+8%
  6. Battery saver mode24 days vs 25 days+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare