NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Pro vs Pace 3

Amazfit Cheetah Pro vs Coros Pace 3

What Cheetah Pro does better (8) and where Pace 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Pro
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Pro
7.3Score
8 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $200
9.4Display3.4
6.0Battery life5.3
9.8Sports & outdoor2.3
4.5Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah ProPace 3
47 × 4711.841.9 × 41.911.7
Cheetah ProPace 3Difference
Height47 mm41.9 mm+5.1 mm
Width47 mm41.9 mm+5.1 mm
Thickness11.8 mm11.7 mm+0.1 mm
Weight34 g39 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Pro better than Pace 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pace 3: No
  2. GPS battery life44 h vs 38 h+16%
  3. Sport profiles156 vs 285.6×
  4. Screen size1.45″ vs 1.2″+21%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 240 px2×
  6. Weight34 g vs 39 g+15%
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 15 h+73%
  8. Pixel density331 ppi vs 200 ppi+66%

Why is Pace 3 better than Cheetah Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 15 days+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare