vs
7.8Display4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cheetah RoundNC92E
| Cheetah Round | NC92E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46.7 mm | 15 mm | +31.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cheetah Round better than NC92E?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · NC92E: No
- Resolution (width)454 px vs 170 px2.7×
Why is NC92E better than Cheetah Round?
- Screen size1.39″ vs 1.47″+6%
- Battery capacity440 mAh vs 500 mAh+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 15 mm |
| Weight | 32 g | — |
| Thickness | 11.9 mm | — |
| Height | 46.7 mm | — |
| Width | 46.7 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass +anti-fingerprint coating | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.39″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 454 px | 170 px |
| Resolution (height) | 454 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery saver mode | 24 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 44 h | — |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 26 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 440 mAh | 500 mAh |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Sport profiles | 150 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Music on the watch | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Zepp OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
