NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Square vs Pace 3

Amazfit Cheetah Square vs Coros Pace 3

What Cheetah Square does better (7) and where Pace 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Square
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Square
5.4Score
7 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $200
9.5Display3.4
2.2Battery life5.3
9.7Sports & outdoor2.3
4.6Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah SquarePace 3
44 × 38.79.941.9 × 41.911.7
Cheetah SquarePace 3Difference
Height38.7 mm41.9 mm−3.2 mm
Width44 mm41.9 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.7 mm−1.8 mm
Weight25 g39 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Square better than Pace 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pace 3: No
  2. Weight25 g vs 39 g+56%
  3. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.2″+46%
  4. Sport profiles150 vs 285.4×
  5. Pixel density341 ppi vs 200 ppi+70%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
  7. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.7 mm+18%

Why is Pace 3 better than Cheetah Square?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 15 days+88%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 38 h+90%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 15 h+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare