NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Square vs Pace 4

Amazfit Cheetah Square vs Coros Pace 4

What Cheetah Square does better (5) and where Pace 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Square
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Square
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $230
vs
Coros Pace 4
Coros · 2025Pace 4
6.1Score
3 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
9.5Display5.3
2.2Battery life7.1
9.7Sports & outdoor3.8
4.6Build & durability3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah SquarePace 4
44 × 38.79.943.4 × 43.411.8
Cheetah SquarePace 4Difference
Height38.7 mm43.4 mm−4.7 mm
Width44 mm43.4 mm+0.6 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.8 mm−1.9 mm
Weight25 g40 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Square better than Pace 4?

  1. Weight25 g vs 40 g+60%
  2. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.2″+46%
  3. Sport profiles150 vs 285.4×
  4. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.8 mm+19%
  5. Pixel density341 ppi vs 325 ppi+5%

Why is Pace 4 better than Cheetah Square?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 19 days2.4×
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 41 h2×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 31 h2.4×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare