vs
9.5Display4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cheetah SquareNC92E
| Cheetah Square | NC92E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 44 mm | 15 mm | +29 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cheetah Square better than NC92E?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · NC92E: No
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 170 px2.3×
- Screen size1.75″ vs 1.47″+19%
Why is NC92E better than Cheetah Square?
- Battery capacity240 mAh vs 500 mAh2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 15 mm |
| Weight | 25 g | — |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | — |
| Height | 38.7 mm | — |
| Width | 44 mm | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Tempered glass +anti-fingerprint coating | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.75″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 170 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 341 ppi | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | — |
| Battery saver mode | 14 days | — |
| GPS battery life | 20 h | — |
| GPS battery life (dual-band) | 13 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 240 mAh | 500 mAh |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Sport profiles | 150 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Calls from the wrist | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Music on the watch | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Zepp OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
