NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Square vs Race S

Amazfit Cheetah Square vs Suunto Race S

What Cheetah Square does better (5) and where Race S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Square
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Square
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $230
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
6 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
9.5Display4.8
2.2Battery life4.6
9.7Sports & outdoor6.4
4.6Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah SquareRace S
44 × 38.79.945 × 4511.4
Cheetah SquareRace SDifference
Height38.7 mm45 mm−6.3 mm
Width44 mm45 mm−1 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.4 mm−1.5 mm
Weight25 g53 g−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Square better than Race S?

  1. Weight25 g vs 53 g2.1×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No
  3. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.32″+33%
  4. Sport profiles150 vs 95+58%
  5. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.4 mm+15%

Why is Race S better than Cheetah Square?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 40 h2×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 9 days+12%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 30 h2.3×
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  6. Pixel density341 ppi vs 353 ppi+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare