NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Cheetah Square vs Run

Amazfit Cheetah Square vs Suunto Run

What Cheetah Square does better (4) and where Run wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Cheetah Square
Amazfit · 2023Cheetah Square
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $230
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
5 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
9.5Display7.1
2.2Battery life4.5
9.7Sports & outdoor3.7
4.6Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Cheetah SquareRun
44 × 38.79.946 × 4611.5
Cheetah SquareRunDifference
Height38.7 mm46 mm−7.3 mm
Width44 mm46 mm−2 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.5 mm−1.6 mm
Weight25 g36 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Cheetah Square better than Run?

  1. Sport profiles150 vs 324.7×
  2. Weight25 g vs 36 g+44%
  3. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.32″+33%
  4. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.5 mm+16%

Why is Run better than Cheetah Square?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 12 days+50%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 30 h+50%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)13 h vs 20 h+54%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  5. Pixel density341 ppi vs 353 ppi+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare