NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTR 4 vs Vivomove 3S

Amazfit GTR 4 vs Garmin Vivomove 3S

What GTR 4 does better (6) and where Vivomove 3S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTR 4
AmazfitGTR 4
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivomove 3S
Garmin · 2019Vivomove 3S
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $200
6.9Display4.4
7.5Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTR 4Vivomove 3S
46 × 4610.639 × 3910.9
GTR 4Vivomove 3SDifference
Height46 mm39 mm+7 mm
Width46 mm39 mm+7 mm
Thickness10.6 mm10.9 mm−0.3 mm
Weight34 g24 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTR 4 better than Vivomove 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 5 days2.8×
  2. Screen size1.43″ vs 0.8″+79%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 64 px7.3×
  4. Sport profiles150 vs 1113.6×
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 183 ppi+78%
  6. Thickness10.6 mm vs 10.9 mm+3%

Why is Vivomove 3S better than GTR 4?

  1. Weight34 g vs 24.5 g+39%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare