NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 Mini vs 8900

Amazfit GTS 4 Mini vs Hama 8900

What GTS 4 Mini does better (2) and where 8900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
AmazfitGTS 4 Mini
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Hama 8900
Hama · 20238900
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $90
6.0Display5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4 Mini8900
41.8 × 36.79.142 × 42
GTS 4 Mini8900Difference
Case size41.8 mm42 mm−0.2 mm
Weight31 g40 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 Mini better than 8900?

  1. Weight31.2 g vs 40 g+28%
  2. Screen size1.65″ vs 1.3″+27%

Why is 8900 better than GTS 4 Mini?

  1. Resolution (width)336 px vs 466 px+39%
  2. Battery capacity270 mAh vs 300 mAh+11%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare