NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 Mini vs Poco Watch

Amazfit GTS 4 Mini vs Xiaomi Poco Watch

What GTS 4 Mini does better (6) and where Poco Watch wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
AmazfitGTS 4 Mini
9.4Score
6 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco Watch
Xiaomi · 2022Poco Watch
7.1Score
0 advantages≈ $95
6.0Display6.1
8.2Build & durability8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4 MiniPoco Watch
41.8 × 36.79.134.4 × 39.110
GTS 4 MiniPoco WatchDifference
Height36.7 mm39.1 mm−2.4 mm
Width41.8 mm34.4 mm+7.4 mm
Thickness9.1 mm10 mm−0.9 mm
Weight31 g31 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 Mini better than Poco Watch?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 14 days+7%
  2. Screen size1.65″ vs 1.6″+3%
  3. Battery capacity270 mAh vs 225 mAh+20%
  4. Thickness9.1 mm vs 10 mm+10%
  5. Resolution (width)336 px vs 320 px+5%
  6. Pixel density309 ppi vs 301 ppi+3%

Why is Poco Watch better than GTS 4 Mini?

Poco Watch has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare