NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 vs Venu Sq

Amazfit GTS 4 vs Garmin Venu Sq

What GTS 4 does better (8) and where Venu Sq wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4
AmazfitGTS 4
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Garmin Venu Sq
Garmin · 2020Venu Sq
5.0Score
0 advantages≈ $200
9.2Display4.0
7.4Battery life3.7
9.5Sports & outdoor2.5
9.0Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4Venu Sq
42.7 × 36.59.940.6 × 3711.5
GTS 4Venu SqDifference
Height36.5 mm37 mm−0.5 mm
Width42.7 mm40.6 mm+2.1 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.5 mm−1.6 mm
Weight27 g38 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 better than Venu Sq?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 14 h2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 6 days+33%
  3. Sport profiles150 vs 197.9×
  4. Weight27 g vs 37.6 g+39%
  5. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.3″+35%
  6. Pixel density341 ppi vs 185 ppi+84%
  7. Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
  8. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.5 mm+16%

Why is Venu Sq better than GTS 4?

Venu Sq has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare