NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 vs Vivomove 3S

Amazfit GTS 4 vs Garmin Vivomove 3S

What GTS 4 does better (6) and where Vivomove 3S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4
AmazfitGTS 4
9.5Score
6 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivomove 3S
Garmin · 2019Vivomove 3S
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $200
9.2Display4.4
9.0Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4Vivomove 3S
42.7 × 36.59.939 × 3910.9
GTS 4Vivomove 3SDifference
Height36.5 mm39 mm−2.5 mm
Width42.7 mm39 mm+3.7 mm
Thickness9.9 mm10.9 mm−1 mm
Weight27 g24 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 better than Vivomove 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 5 days+60%
  2. Screen size1.75″ vs 0.8″2.2×
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 64 px6.1×
  4. Sport profiles150 vs 1113.6×
  5. Pixel density341 ppi vs 183 ppi+86%
  6. Thickness9.9 mm vs 10.9 mm+10%

Why is Vivomove 3S better than GTS 4?

  1. Weight27 g vs 24.5 g+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare