NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 vs Ignite

Amazfit GTS 4 vs Polar Ignite

What GTS 4 does better (9) and where Ignite wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4
AmazfitGTS 4
9.5Score
9 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Polar Ignite
Polar · 2019Ignite
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $220
9.2Display2.4
7.4Battery life3.9
9.5Sports & outdoor2.2
9.0Build & durability2.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4Ignite
42.7 × 36.59.943 × 438.5
GTS 4IgniteDifference
Height36.5 mm43 mm−6.5 mm
Width42.7 mm43 mm−0.3 mm
Thickness9.9 mm8.5 mm+1.4 mm
Weight27 g35 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 better than Ignite?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)8 days vs 4.5 days+78%
  2. GPS battery life28 h vs 18 h+56%
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Ignite: No
  4. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  5. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.2″+46%
  6. Weight27 g vs 35 g+30%
  7. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 165 mAh+82%
  8. Pixel density341 ppi vs 200 ppi+70%
  9. Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%

Why is Ignite better than GTS 4?

  1. Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.5 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare