NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GTS 4 vs iQOO Watch

Amazfit GTS 4 vs Vivo iQOO Watch

What GTS 4 does better (4) and where iQOO Watch wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit GTS 4
AmazfitGTS 4
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Watch
Vivo · 2024iQOO Watch
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ $170
9.2Display7.5
9.5Sports & outdoor8.0
9.0Build & durability6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

GTS 4iQOO Watch
42.7 × 36.59.946.1 × 46.111.3
GTS 4iQOO WatchDifference
Height36.5 mm46.1 mm−9.6 mm
Width42.7 mm46.1 mm−3.4 mm
Thickness9.9 mm11.3 mm−1.4 mm
Weight27 g36 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GTS 4 better than iQOO Watch?

  1. Weight27 g vs 36 g+33%
  2. Screen size1.75″ vs 1.43″+22%
  3. Thickness9.9 mm vs 11.3 mm+14%
  4. Pixel density341 ppi vs 326 ppi+5%

Why is iQOO Watch better than GTS 4?

  1. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 505 mAh+68%
  2. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare