vs
9.7Build & durability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Helio CoreMoto Watch Fit
| Helio Core | Moto Watch Fit | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 24.3 mm | 44.5 mm | −20.2 mm |
| Width | 33.9 mm | 38 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 9.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 11 g | 25 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Helio Core better than Moto Watch Fit?
- Weight11.2 g vs 25 g2.2×
Why is Moto Watch Fit better than Helio Core?
- Built-in GPSNo · Helio Core: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | 11.2 g | 25 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 24.3 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Width | 33.9 mm | 38 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Trekking Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.9″ |
| Display technology | No display | OLED |
| Panel | — | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 348 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 442 px |
| Pixel density | — | 296 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 232 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | RTOS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
