NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Pro vs Pace 2

Amazfit T-Rex Pro vs Coros Pace 2

What T-Rex Pro does better (7) and where Pace 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Pro
Amazfit · 2021T-Rex Pro
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace 2
Coros · 2020Pace 2
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $180
9.6Display2.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor2.3
8.6Build & durability3.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex ProPace 2
47.7 × 47.713.542 × 4211.7
T-Rex ProPace 2Difference
Case size47.7 mm42 mm+5.7 mm
Thickness13.5 mm11.7 mm+1.8 mm
Weight59 g35 g+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Pro better than Pace 2?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 5 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pace 2: No
  3. Offline mapsYes · Pace 2: No
  4. Screen size2″ vs 1.2″+67%
  5. Resolution (width)800 px vs 240 px3.3×
  6. Pixel density598 ppi vs 200 ppi3×
  7. Sport profiles120 vs 206×

Why is Pace 2 better than T-Rex Pro?

  1. Weight59.4 g vs 35 g+70%
  2. Thickness13.5 mm vs 11.7 mm+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare