NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Vertical

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Suunto Vertical

What T-Rex Ultra does better (3) and where Vertical wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $400
8.0Display4.4
7.2Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor6.4
6.3Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraVertical
47.3 × 47.313.449 × 4913.6
T-Rex UltraVerticalDifference
Height47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Width47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness13.4 mm13.6 mm−0.2 mm
Weight89 g86 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Vertical?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  2. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  3. Resolution (width)454 px vs 280 px+62%

Why is Vertical better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. GPS battery life46 h vs 90 h+96%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 20.8 days+4%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 65 h2.3×
  4. Weight89 g vs 86 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare