NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Watch Series 6 Aluminum vs Vivoactive 4

Apple Watch Series 6 Aluminum vs Garmin Vivoactive 4

What Watch Series 6 Aluminum does better (7) and where Vivoactive 4 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Apple Watch Series 6 Aluminum
8.9Score
7 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ $350
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor2.4
9.0Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Watch Series 6 AluminumVivoactive 4
38 × 4410.745.1 × 45.112.8
Watch Series 6 AluminumVivoactive 4Difference
Height44 mm45.1 mm−1.1 mm
Width38 mm45.1 mm−7.1 mm
Thickness10.7 mm12.8 mm−2.1 mm
Weight36 g50 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Watch Series 6 Aluminum better than Vivoactive 4?

  1. Weight36.5 g vs 50.5 g+38%
  2. Screen size1.78″ vs 1.3″+37%
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Vivoactive 4: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Vivoactive 4: No
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  6. Resolution (width)368 px vs 260 px+42%
  7. Thickness10.7 mm vs 12.8 mm+20%

Why is Vivoactive 4 better than Watch Series 6 Aluminum?

Vivoactive 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare