NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Watch Series 6 Aluminum vs Vivoactive 4S

Apple Watch Series 6 Aluminum vs Garmin Vivoactive 4S

What Watch Series 6 Aluminum does better (7) and where Vivoactive 4S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Apple Watch Series 6 Aluminum
8.9Score
7 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4S
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4S
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ $350
5.0Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor2.4
9.0Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Watch Series 6 AluminumVivoactive 4S
38 × 4410.740 × 4012.7
Watch Series 6 AluminumVivoactive 4SDifference
Height44 mm40 mm+4 mm
Width38 mm40 mm−2 mm
Thickness10.7 mm12.7 mm−2 mm
Weight36 g40 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Watch Series 6 Aluminum better than Vivoactive 4S?

  1. Screen size1.78″ vs 1.1″+62%
  2. Sapphire crystalYes · Vivoactive 4S: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Vivoactive 4S: No
  4. Weight36.5 g vs 40 g+10%
  5. Resolution (width)368 px vs 218 px+69%
  6. Pixel density326 ppi vs 198 ppi+65%
  7. Thickness10.7 mm vs 12.7 mm+19%

Why is Vivoactive 4S better than Watch Series 6 Aluminum?

Vivoactive 4S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare