vs
3.1Display2.3
9.4Health tracking2.1
2.2Build & durability4.3
Why is VivoWatch 5 better than Pacer?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 6.5 days+54%
- TouchscreenYes · Pacer: No
- Skin temperatureYes · Pacer: No
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 265 mAh+13%
Why is Pacer better than VivoWatch 5?
- Weight74 g vs 40 g+85%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 40 g |
| Thickness | — | 11.5 mm |
| Height | — | 45 mm |
| Width | — | 45 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | WR50 |
| Colours | — | Night Black, Purple Dusk, Cloud White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) |
| Panel | LCD | MIP |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Pixel density | — | 200 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 6.5 days |
| GPS battery life | — | 32 h |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 265 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Pol |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Skin temperature | Yes | No |
| HRV tracking | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2, temperature | Accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Offline maps | — | No |
| Barometric altimeter | — | No |
| Compass | — | No |
| LED flashlight | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Polar OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
