vs
5.6Display7.6
Why is VivoWatch 6 better than Watch GT 3 Porsche Design?
VivoWatch 6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch GT 3 Porsche Design better than VivoWatch 6?
- Battery capacity290 mAh vs 530 mAh+83%
- Screen size1.39″ vs 1.43″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | — | 54 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.9 mm |
| Height | — | 46.6 mm |
| Width | — | 46.6 mm |
| Case material | — | Titanium |
| Sapphire crystal | — | Yes |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Dark Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.39″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 290 mAh | 530 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Temperature sensor | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2, thermometer (body temperature) |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Platform | — | HarmonyOS |
