5.6Display4.1
Why is VivoWatch 6 better than BT103?
- Built-in GPSYes · BT103: No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · BT103: No
Why is BT103 better than VivoWatch 6?
- Screen size1.39″ vs 1.91″+37%
- Battery capacity290 mAh vs 300 mAh+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | — | 100 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.9 mm |
| Height | — | 49.5 mm |
| Width | — | 40 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | Tempered glass |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.39″ | 1.91″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 380 px |
| Pixel density | — | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 14 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 290 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
