vs
5.0Health tracking5.0
6.4Build & durability5.6
Why is VivoWatch SP better than Watch GT Runner?
- Weight36 g vs 38.5 g+7%
Why is Watch GT Runner better than VivoWatch SP?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 14 days+40%
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · VivoWatch SP: Yes
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 455 mAh2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | 36 g | 38.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 46.4 mm |
| Width | — | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m / 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 466 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | 14 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 455 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Platform | — | HarmonyOS |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS |
