Why is 301 better than SWC-195?
301 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SWC-195 better than 301?
- Screen size1.45″ vs 2.04″+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.45″ | 2.04″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
