Why is Watch 102 better than Fit 1.0?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.78″+3%
Why is Fit 1.0 better than Watch 102?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)4 days vs 5 days+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | — | 12 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas Mineralglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.78″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 368 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 448 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Band 10vsBea-Fon Watch 1028.69.5vs
Bea-Fon Watch 102vsFitbit PSMART PRO Mini Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED9.59.2
vsNilox ONAIRvsBea-Fon Watch 102
vs
Huawei Band 11vsIce Watch Fit 1.09.09.3vsHuawei Band 10vsIce Watch Fit 1.08.69.3vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsFitbit PSMART PRO Mini Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED9.39.2