Why is Watch 201 better than U1?
- Built-in GPSYes · U1: No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · U1: No
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
Why is U1 better than Watch 201?
- Screen size1.85″ vs 1.93″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | — | 43.8 g |
| Thickness | — | 11.4 mm |
| Height | — | 49.8 mm |
| Width | — | 42.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | — | 1 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.85″ | 1.93″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 288 px |
| Pixel density | — | 194 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 300 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | Android | — |
