vs
3.0Display9.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
BTIONWATCHPRORKPSW 100
| BTIONWATCHPRORK | PSW 100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 35 mm | 48 mm | −13 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 12 mm | +22 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BTIONWATCHPRORK better than PSW 100?
BTIONWATCHPRORK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 100 better than BTIONWATCHPRORK?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BTIONWATCHPRORK: Yes
- Thickness34 mm vs 12 mm2.8×
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.43″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | 48 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 12 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsBea-Fon 501vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watchvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsColmi V75
vs
Bea-Fon 401 RoundvsPeaq PSW 1008.98.9vsPeaq PSW 100vsBea-Fon 501