vs
3.2Display6.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
BTIONWATCHPRORKPSW 200
| BTIONWATCHPRORK | PSW 200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 35 mm | 44 mm | −9 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 9 mm | +25 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BTIONWATCHPRORK better than PSW 200?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.32″+5%
Why is PSW 200 better than BTIONWATCHPRORK?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BTIONWATCHPRORK: Yes
- Thickness34 mm vs 9 mm3.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | 44 mm |
| Thickness | 34 mm | 9 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsColmi V75
vs
Bea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORK
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsReflex Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWS
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsRadley RYS08-2088
vs
Blackview W70 ProvsPeaq PSW 200
vs
Reflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsPeaq PSW 200
