vs
2.1Display9.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
BTIONWATCHPROSKPSW 100
| BTIONWATCHPROSK | PSW 100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 46 mm | 48 mm | −2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BTIONWATCHPROSK better than PSW 100?
BTIONWATCHPROSK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 100 better than BTIONWATCHPROSK?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · BTIONWATCHPROSK: Yes
- Screen size1″ vs 1.43″+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | 48 mm |
| Thickness | — | 12 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto Watch 2vsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSKvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSKvsColmi V75
vsReflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSKvs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSKvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60gvs
Colmi V75vsPeaq PSW 100
vsBea-Fon 401 RoundvsPeaq PSW 1009.19.1