Why is ION 60800 better than TX-SW7HR?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.69″+8%
Why is TX-SW7HR better than ION 60800?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 7 days+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Kunststoff, Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.69″ |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | Farbdisplay |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 208 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 190 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | Proprietär |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Cellular Line ION 60800vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watchvs
Cellular Line ION 60800vsMaxcom FW43 Cobalt 2
vsSekonda Motion Plus Smart WatchvsCellular Line ION 60800
vsSekonda Flex SmartvsCellular Line ION 60800
vs
Technaxx TX-SW7HRvsWahoo Elemnt Rival
vsTicwatch Pro 3 UltravsTechnaxx TX-SW7HR