Why is ION 60800 better than XIN100101?
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.3″+41%
Why is XIN100101 better than ION 60800?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · ION 60800: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff, Silikon | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | Farbdisplay |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 360 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Cellular Line ION 60800vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watchvs
Cellular Line ION 60800vsMaxcom FW43 Cobalt 2vs
Cellular Line ION 60800vsTechnaxx TX-SW7HR
vsSekonda Motion Plus Smart WatchvsCellular Line ION 60800
vsSekonda Flex SmartvsCellular Line ION 60800
vsXoro XIN100101vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch