NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 2 vs Run

Coros Pace 2 vs Suunto Run

What Pace 2 does better (1) and where Run wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 2
Coros · 2020Pace 2
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $180
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
7 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
2.9Display7.1
3.8Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.3Sports & outdoor3.7
3.8Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 2Run
42 × 4211.746 × 4611.5
Pace 2RunDifference
Height42 mm46 mm−4 mm
Width42 mm46 mm−4 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.5 mm+0.2 mm
Weight35 g36 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 2 better than Run?

  1. Weight35 g vs 36 g+3%

Why is Run better than Pace 2?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Pace 2: Yes
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 12 days+9%
  3. GPS battery life27 h vs 30 h+11%
  4. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  6. Pixel density200 ppi vs 353 ppi+76%
  7. Sport profiles20 vs 32+60%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare