NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 3 vs Instinct E 40mm

Coros Pace 3 vs Garmin Instinct E 40mm

What Pace 3 does better (7) and where Instinct E 40mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
7 advantages≈ $200
vs
Garmin Instinct E 40mm
Garmin · 2025Instinct E 40mm
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
3.4Display2.4
5.3Battery life4.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.3Sports & outdoor4.5
3.5Build & durability5.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 3Instinct E 40mm
41.9 × 41.911.740 × 4013.6
Pace 3Instinct E 40mmDifference
Height41.9 mm40 mm+1.9 mm
Width41.9 mm40 mm+1.9 mm
Thickness11.7 mm13.6 mm−1.9 mm
Weight39 g41 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 3 better than Instinct E 40mm?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 21 h+81%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 14 days+7%
  3. Storage4 GB vs 0.12 GB33.3×
  4. Weight39 g vs 41 g+5%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 136 ppi+47%
  6. Resolution (width)240 px vs 166 px+45%
  7. Thickness11.7 mm vs 13.6 mm+16%

Why is Instinct E 40mm better than Pace 3?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 692.5×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare