NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 3 vs 5 PEAK

Coros Pace 3 vs Suunto 5 PEAK

What Pace 3 does better (7) and where 5 PEAK wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
7 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Suunto 5 PEAK
Suunto · 20225 PEAK
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $170
3.4Display2.0
5.3Battery life2.3
2.3Sports & outdoor2.3
3.5Build & durability2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 35 PEAK
41.9 × 41.911.743 × 4312.9
Pace 35 PEAKDifference
Height41.9 mm43 mm−1.1 mm
Width41.9 mm43 mm−1.1 mm
Thickness11.7 mm12.9 mm−1.2 mm
Weight39 g39 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 3 better than 5 PEAK?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 7 days2.1×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  3. Dual-band GPSYes · 5 PEAK: No
  4. Water resistance5 ATM vs 3 ATM+67%
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  6. Thickness11.7 mm vs 12.9 mm+10%
  7. Resolution (width)240 px vs 218 px+10%

Why is 5 PEAK better than Pace 3?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 802.9×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare