NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 3 vs Run

Coros Pace 3 vs Suunto Run

What Pace 3 does better (3) and where Run wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $200
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
7 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
3.4Display7.1
5.3Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.3Sports & outdoor3.7
3.5Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 3Run
41.9 × 41.911.746 × 4611.5
Pace 3RunDifference
Height41.9 mm46 mm−4.1 mm
Width41.9 mm46 mm−4.1 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.5 mm+0.2 mm
Weight39 g36 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 3 better than Run?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 12 days+25%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×

Why is Run better than Pace 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Pace 3: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  4. Weight39 g vs 36 g+8%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 353 ppi+76%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)15 h vs 20 h+33%
  7. Sport profiles28 vs 32+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare